

10-Year Trends
How Rotherham Aspire has changed over the last decade
10-Year Historical Trends
Toggle data series below. Left Axis: Percentage (%) • Right Axis: Count / Enrolment
Data Insights
Comparing nationallyToggle metrics in the sidebar to plot them on the chart above. Active metrics are shown first below.
What this means: The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) teachers employed at the school. Part-time teachers are counted proportionally (e.g. a teacher working 3 days counts as 0.6 FTE).
Teacher numbers typically reflect the size and funding of the school. A school with 13 FTE teachers is relatively small. Changes over time may indicate growth, budget pressures, or restructuring.
What this means: The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) teaching assistants employed at the school, including higher-level teaching assistants (HLTAs).
Teaching assistant numbers vary widely between schools. This school has a relatively high number of TAs, which often indicates significant SEN provision or a focus on classroom support.
What this means: The pupil-to-teacher ratio (PTR) divides the total number of pupils by the number of FTE teachers. It indicates how many pupils each teacher is responsible for on average, though actual class sizes may differ.
A lower pupil-to-teacher ratio often indicates smaller class sizes, which usually allows for more individualised attention.
📊 📊 Rotherham Aspire is ranked 19,639th out of 21,095 schools nationally
What this means: Teacher turnover rate shows the percentage of teachers who left the school during the academic year. This includes retirements, resignations, and transfers.
A turnover rate above 20% is typically considered high and may suggest recruitment challenges, workload pressures, or leadership changes.
📊 📊 Rotherham Aspire is ranked 20,102nd out of 20,457 schools nationally
What this means: The teacher sickness absence rate shows the percentage of possible teaching days lost to sickness absence across all teachers during the academic year.
A teacher absence rate above 5% is higher than the national average and may indicate workforce wellbeing challenges or an above-average level of long-term sickness.
📊 📊 Rotherham Aspire is ranked 8,725th out of 18,930 schools nationally
What this means: The average number of days lost to sickness absence per teacher during the academic year. This includes both short-term and long-term absences.
This level of teacher absence days is within or below the typical range for most schools.
📊 📊 Rotherham Aspire is ranked 10,844th out of 18,919 schools nationally
What this means: The percentage of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals (FSM). FSM eligibility is widely used as a proxy indicator for socio-economic disadvantage.
An FSM rate above 30% is significantly above the national average and typically indicates a school serving a community with higher levels of deprivation.
What this means: The percentage of pupils identified as having Special Educational Needs (SEN), including both SEN Support and those with Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans.
An SEN rate above 20% is higher than the national average and may indicate strong SEN identification practices or a school that attracts families seeking good SEN provision.
📊 📊 Rotherham Aspire is ranked 1st out of 22,081 schools nationally
What this means: The percentage of pupils receiving SEN Support — the first tier of SEN provision, where additional help is provided within the school without an EHC plan.
This level of SEN Support is above the national average. The proportion often reflects how the school identifies and categorises additional needs.
What this means: The percentage of pupils with an Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan — the highest level of SEN support, involving a legally binding document specifying the provision required.
An EHC rate above 5% is higher than typical and may indicate the school has specialist provision or a strong reputation for supporting complex needs.
Rankings and contextual summaries are provided for informational purposes only and should not be taken as definitive judgements of school quality. Data is sourced from publicly available government datasets and may contain inaccuracies. School performance is influenced by many factors not captured in these metrics.